Posted by: The Busy Post | June 22, 2012

Drone strikes threaten 50 years of international law, says UN rapporteur | World news | guardian.co.uk


I bet you no one else is happier that this week is ending than our fearless Leader!

Drone

The US policy of using aerial drones to carry out targeted killings presents a major challenge to the system of international law that has endured since the second world war, a United Nations investigator has said.

Christof Heyns, the UN special rapporteur on extrajudicial killings, summary or arbitrary executions, told a conference in Geneva that President Obama’s attacks in Pakistan, Yemen and elsewhere, carried out by the CIA, would encourage other states to flout long-established human rights standards.

In his strongest critique so far of drone strikes, Heyns suggested some may even constitute “war crimes”. His comments come amid rising international unease over the surge in killings by remotely piloted unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).

Addressing the conference, which was organised by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), a second UN rapporteur, Ben Emmerson QC, who monitors counter-terrorism, announced he would be prioritising inquiries into drone strikes.

The London-based barrister said the issue was moving rapidly up the international agenda after China and Russia this week jointly issued a statement at the UN Human Rights Council, backed by other countries, condemning drone attacks.

If the US or any other states responsible for attacks outside recognised war zones did not establish independent investigations into each killing, Emmerson emphasised, then “the UN itself should consider establishing an investigatory body”.

Also present was Pakistan’s ambassador to the UN in Geneva, Zamir Akram, who called for international legal action to halt the “totally counterproductive attacks” by the US in his country.

Heyns, a South African law professor, told the meeting: “Are we to accept major changes to the international legal system which has been in existence since world war two and survived nuclear threats?”

Some states, he added, “find targeted killings immensely attractive. Others may do so in future … Current targeting practices weaken the rule of law. Killings may be lawful in an armed conflict [such as Afghanistan] but many targeted killings take place far from areas where it’s recognised as being an armed conflict.”

If it is true, he said, that “there have been secondary drone strikes on rescuers who are helping (the injured) after an initial drone attack, those further attacks are a war crime”.

Heyns ridiculed the US suggestion that targeted UAV strikes on al-Qaida or allied groups were a legitimate response to the 9/11 attacks. “It’s difficult to see how any killings carried out in 2012 can be justified as in response to [events] in 2001,” he said. “Some states seem to want to invent new laws to justify new practices.

“The targeting is often operated by intelligence agencies which fall outside the scope of accountability. The term ‘targeted killing’ is wrong because it suggests little violence has occurred. The collateral damage may be less than aerial bombardment, but because they eliminate the risk to soldiers they can be used more often.”

Heyns told the Guardian later that his future inquiries are likely to include the question of whether other countries, such as the UK, share intelligence with the US that could be used for selecting individuals as targets. A legal case has already been lodged in London over the UK’s alleged role in the deaths of British citizens and others as a consequence of US drone strikes in Pakistan.

Emmerson said that protection of the right to life required countries to establish independent inquiries into each drone killing. “That needs to be applied in the context of targeted killings,” he said. “It’s possible for a state to establish an independent ombudsman to inquire into every attack and there needs to be a report to justify [the killing].”

Alternatively, he said, it was “for the UN itself to consider establishing an investigatory body. Drones attacks by the US raise fundamental questions which are a direct consequence of my mandate… If they don’t [investigate] themselves, we will do it for them.”

It is time, he added, to end the “conspiracy of silence” over drone attacks and “shine the light of independent investigation” into the process. The attacks, he noted, were not only on those who had been killed but on the system of “international law itself”.

The Pakistani ambassador declared that more than a thousand civilians had been killed in his country by US drone strikes. “We find the use of drones to be totally counterproductive in terms of succeeding in the war against terror. It leads to greater levels of terror rather than reducing them,” he said.

Claims made by the US about the accuracy of drone strikes were “totally incorrect”, he added. Victims who had tried to bring compensation claims through the Pakistani courts had been blocked by US refusals to respond to legal actions.

The US has defended drone attacks as self-defence against al-Qaida and has refused to allow judicial scrutiny of the UAV programme. On Wednesday, the Obama administration issued a fresh rebuff through the US courts to an ACLU request for information about targeting policies. Such details, it insisted, must remain “classified”.

Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU’s national security project, said: “Something that is being debated in UN hallways and committee rooms cannot apparently be talked about in US courtrooms, according to the government. Whether the CIA is involved in targeted lethal operation is now classified. It’s an absurd fiction.”

The ACLU estimates that as many as 4,000 people have been killed in US drone strikes since 2002 in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia. Of those, a significant proportion were civilians. The numbers killed have escalated significantly since Obama became president.

The USA is not a signatory to the International Criminal Court (ICC) or many other international legal forums where legal action might be started. It is, however, part of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) where cases can be initiated by one state against another.

Ian Seiderman, director of the International Commission of Jurists, told the conference that “immense damage was being done to the fabric of international law”.

One of the latest UAV developments that concerns human rights groups is the way in which attacks, they allege, have moved towards targeting groups based on perceived patterns of behaviour that look suspicious from aerial surveillance, rather than relying on intelligence about specific al-Qaida activists.

In response to a report by Heyns to the UN Human Rights Council this week, the US put out a statement in Geneva saying there was “unequivocal US commitment to conducting such operations with extraordinary care and in accordance with all applicable law, including the law of war”.

It added that there was “continuing commitment to greater transparency and a sincere effort to address some of the important questions that have been raised”.

via Drone strikes threaten 50 years of international law, says UN rapporteur | World news | guardian.co.uk.

About these ads

Responses

  1. I wonder if you would have held the same opinion if this had been done under the George Bush Administration?

    • Johndoesn’t things thru the view of Right vs. Wrong; he sees them as Liberal vs. Non-Liberal. I believe hr lights candles at Barry’s altar.

  2. Drone strikes do a valuable service in eliminating terrorist threats and anyone who opposes them should be viewed as terrorist sympathizers. On this one issue, I am totally Right Wing Conservative.


What are your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

Defy The Narrative

politics, religion, opinion, random thoughts, and complete nonsense

lidsamy

when 140 characters is not enough

Political Alchemist's Blog

A conservative wizard's WordPress.com site

Articles,blogs,books,videos,etc.

Jerry Lingle's favorite web resources

A Patriotic Nurse

God, Country, Constitution

sharia unveiled

illuminating minds

moralmatters.org

A website of news commentary, comments and articles, - highlighting moral, political and spiritual issues.

saneromeo

"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." George Orwell

Nonoy Manga

Manga, Hand Drawn, Animation, Drawing Lessons.

The Clockwork Conservative

All wound up about politics, history, culture... lots of stuff.

Conservative First

putting principles before party and technology into politics

divadoll123

Absolutely, positively, and unequivocally NOT an Obamamama!

Illuminutti

Where critical thinking is critical to thinking

The Busy Post

------ "Nowhere at present is there such a measureless loathing of their country by educated people as in America." ------ Eric Hoffer

22MOON.COM

You can see the whole Earth from the Moon!

All Mirth and No Matter

opinions on writing, reading and pretty much anything not 'rithmatic

The United States Patriot

A topnotch WordPress.com site

rodalena

"A fool also is full of words…" -Ecclesiastes 10:14a

A Reformed Thought

News from around the block, around the country, and around the world.

et cetera*

Asininities of the Human Kind

Oyia Brown

A WordPress site to give you a smile

AmeriKim Patriot

One of Many AmeriKim Patriots On the RIGHT Side of America!

Texana's Kitchen

Yummy food. Pithy commentary. Pretty pictures.

Stirring Trouble internationally

Politics Music News Satire And Entertainment

The Mad Jewess

With political commentary contributed by NYC/QP Cable TV's David Ben Moshe.

rope

people just need enough rope

Economists For Romney

Economists Supporting Mitt Romney for President

Just Cruisin 2

Where Intellectuals and Rednecks foregather.

Armor of God

Attempting to obey God and follow Jesus Christ our Lord

YouViewed/Editorial

News , Blues and Guns ... Not Necessarily In That Order

Douglas Ernst

Bareknuckled Commentary mixed with Pop Culture.

So I Married A Baseball Player...

Behind every married baseball player is a woman who didn't know what she was getting herself into.

living is a process

...so please be patient with me.

blogsense-by-barb

at the Re-Birth of America!

SOYLENT GREEN

Just What You Need When You're Freezing In The Dark

ahsbling

More Than Your Ordinary Bling

Real Life Dynamics User

Real Life Experiences With Microsoft Dynamics GP / CRM

Common Sense Newz

"The cause of America is in a great measure the cause of all mankind" Thomas Paine, Common Sense, 1776

Young, Republican, & Free

Politics; As Seen by an Eighteen Year Old Republican

The Steadfast Patriot

Where Common Sense Reigns Supreme

The Mad Jewess

Mirror Site For Reflection

Samaritans Scalawags Scoundrels Fleecing the Sheep

Skulking Down the Dirt Roads of Life

Common Sense

Life, liberty and property!

4ever21christina

A blog for the happy, modern, well-rounded woman

Clement Allen Photography

Updates about my gliding and photographic life will appear here.

southernstylemusings

An Amateur Economist's Perspective on the Political Battlefield

Without wax /

Andy Ritchie blog

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,316 other followers

%d bloggers like this: